TTS AAR: Venice Abroad versus Marian Romans

/

Here’s an After Action Report of a game of To The Strongest played as a practice session for this year’s Briton competition: my Venetians versus Peter’s Marian Romans.

I have Marian Romans, so I know how manoeuvrable they are, so it was no surprise when Peter set up with all his troops in one quarter of the battlefield with a command of light cavalry on the other flank: his intention being to either fight his whole army against only part of mine, or have the light cavalry get around my flank with disastrous results, or use the Romans’ manouevrability to react to whatever I did, or a combination of all three!

My plan was to send my knights forward into the Roman half of the battlefield, and then turn to the right and hopefully hammer the Romans from front and flank as my infantry came forward.

First, however, I needed to make sure that I kept an idea on that enemy light cavalry. This was a job for my mounted crossbowmen, who quickly shot down the veteran Numidians, removing one threat to my left flank.

Meanwhile, the Romans had expanded out of their initial tight formation, and were manouevring into a position where they could fight to both front and flank.

I did see an opportunity to kill another of the light cavalry units by squishing them between two unit of Knights, but unfortunately the cards were having none of it and the moment quickly passed.

Despite this minor setback, my plan unfolded nicely, and when contact was properly made with the Romans, it was generally with my troops having the advantage either from flank charges or being able to get two units onto one enemy one.

Unfortunately, although the cards I’d had for moving around the battlefield were decent enough, that good fortune didn’t extend to the actual combats themselves, and the initial clash left the Venetians down a unit of Knights and Spearmen having destroyed only one small unit of legionaries.

Meanwhile, on the right, the Venetian Alabardiers drove the Roman cavalry back towards their camp. For a moment I had visions of killing the enemy horse and taking the Roman camp, but forcing Peter withdrew a Legionary unit from the front line to combat this threat, and soon my right flank was empty of all Venetian troops except a couple of units of handgunner lights!

The battle was definitely not going my way: the manoeuvrability of the Romans combined with their veteran status making them very hard to kill.

I did, however, still have some Knights out of the left flank and, in a glorious charge back into the centre of the field, the “Broken Lances” rode down and destroyed an entire Legionary unit in one legendary thump from the flank!

That put me right back in the game, especially as the Roman formation had now got slightly extended, with the game breaking up into a series of individual combats.

So all I needed was one more turn where my flank charges went in and my shooting was effective and I could still win the game.

Unfortunately, it was not to be. At this crucial moment my veteran Knights (technically saving on a five, but obviously wearing their cardboard armour) were knocked off the table by a unit of Legionaries pulling a ten and then a decent melee card to get one final successful attack before Peter’s turn ended.

That was a very frustrating end to what had been a great game: and the closest I have come to beating Mr Riding for some time…but I was at least pleased that I had dealt with the initial Roman deployment and first phase of the battle well, even if the actual fighting bits hadn’t gone my way. Previously I would have let the enemy light cavalry harrass me from the flank and ended up with my Knights fighting air whilst the rest of the Romans mashed through my infantry to give Peter an easy victory…so an improvement of sorts at least!

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Game 4: Arab Conquest vs Later Carthaginians

/

My final game at this year’s To The Smallest competition was an absolutely bonkers affair against other-Rob’s Later Carthaginians.

I say ‘absolutely bonkers’ as I’ve never played a game of To The Strongest quite like it. Seven of the eight Generals that started the game died; I was pulling 10’s out of the pack like there were no lower cards present; victory could have gone to either side in the final stages of the battle ; and the whole 160 point game was over in 45 minutes!

So what actually happened…

First up, Arab mounted infantry and the Take the High Ground” strategem card meant that the two sides started the game really close together:

The first action was on the far left, where Rob had been trying to sneak a unit of massed light cavalry around my flank. Not wanting this to happen, I sent some light camelry in that direction, thinking to intercept the Numidians in a turn or so.

The cards, however, were with me, and pulling a couple of tens in a row meant that I hit the lights in the flank right when they were on the edge of the field.

Although the camels didn’t manage to destroy the Numidians, they did disorder them, and for the rest of the game the two sides knocked seven bells out of each other without either side actually managing to finish off their opponent.

Meanwhile, on the other flank, some more Numidian cavalry had managed to get onto my flank, and despite the fact that they were raw massed lights, eventually managed to wipe out the cavalry command I had stationed there!

This was a bit unfortunate, but the cavalry had managed to take some of the enemy with them, so not a total loss.

Back to the centre, which had neatly divided into two halves as the two battle lines moved together.

Left-of-centre, I had a couple of units of Jund cavalry facing vast numbers of Celtic types - these Carthaginians are a mixed bunch! - but the Jund were on form smashing one warband from the field and moving up to engage the others. My cards had been very good here: lots of tens!

Generals had been dying in droves at this point: Rob had already lost three, and I had lost two, and at two Victory Medals apiece, that can really cut into your cache!

Right of centre, the action developed into a massive infantry melee as deep units of Hoplites and Spearmen smashed into my Warriors (half of them Fanatics).

Disorder markers rained down on the units involved, with the advantage slightly with me as my Fanatics ignored the associated penalty on combat ability.

The luck, however, stayed with me, and a final flurry of ten’s from my infantry (in defence as well as attack) and the death of the last remaining Carthaginians general gave me another five coins and the game.

I had won 16-9, but that didn’t really represent how close the game was. I had taken the last of Rob’s coins with a deep unit and a general going i.e. five coins, so before that, we had been on 11-9 in my favour. If my fanatics had gone (I’d already lost their general!) then the score would have been 11-12 in Rob’s favour with all to play for.

It had been a great game, played at a rapid rate of knots, full of action and much hilarity, especially as one general after another bit the dust. A great way to end the tournament. In the end, I came 6th overall, not bad for two wins and two losses…and it’s always a pleasure to game at Firestorm and to see the TTS crowd again.

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Game 3: Arab Conquest vs Ayyubid Egyptian

/

My third game at this year’s To The Smallest 15mm To The Strongest competition was against Richard’s very nicely painted Ayyubid Egyptians.

The Ayyubids had a lot of cavalry available on the flanks, so my plan was once again to hold back on the wings whilst getting my infantry in the centre stuck in as soon as possible.

This I duly did, but without any great success. For some reason the cards had decided that they’d had enough of helping me out, and every single clash resulted in my troops going disordered!

Things continued that way for the rest of the game.

On the right flank, my cavalry moved up into a position where I could get a two to one advantage on one of the enemy units facing me, but the initial clash didn’t go my way to the extent that I ended up losing my cavalry general on that flank.

Now outnumbered, I needed to retreat to consolidate, but an unlucky Ace left me vulnerable. Unbelievably, however, the Egyptian cavalry failed to follow up, giving me time to get away, but the writing was on the wall and, a few turns later, that flank was definitively lost.

Things were not quite so bad on the left flank, where both sides had held back their troops to see what was happening elsewhere on the field.

When the clash did eventually occur, so did mutual self-destruction, with only one of my cavalry units surviving the melee.

So the game would be decided in the centre where, if you remember, the initial clash had not gone my way.

Things broke down into their usual (when using the Arabs) fragmented melee, but with my warbands suffering the effects of that initial clash.

Valiant efforts by the Daylami mountain tribesmen stemmed the tide of enemy troops flooding in from the right flank for a moment, but the loss of both of my foot generals meant that the writing was now on the walls!

The end of the game was very much a damp squib, with me just running out of coins as the attrition of the central melee combined with my losses on the wings took effect.

I had lost 11-16 (including three of my four generals) which showed that my men had been fighting hard if not successfully. A very frustrating game during which even Richard, my opponent, said that I had suffered the most appalling cards: not so much the usual surfeit of Aces, but more my men just not hitting or failing their saves during the general course of play.

But it was a game played in great spirits, and I look forward to a re-match some time in the future!

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Game 2: Arab Conquest vs Later Achaemenid Persian

/

My second game at this year’s To The Smallest was a repeat of the warm-up game I’d had on Friday evening: my Arab Conquest army versus Adrian’s Later Achaemenid Persians. I’d won that game, so that had to be a good omen for this one…didn’t it?

Looking at the Persian deployment, they seemed very strong on my left, so I determined to hold back that flank and sent the rest of my army forward as soon as possible, helped by the fact that my infantry was all mounted.

The idea was that I used most of my army - all except a covering force on the left - to beat half of his army, then turned to fight the rest of his troops from a position of being in the lead coins-wise and having a attacking-the-front-and-flank advantage.

Things started reasonably well. My green flag Jund cavalry began pushing his horsemen back, the Daylami veteran javelinmen managed to disorder the mercenary Greek Hoplites and kill their general, and Adrian still hadn’t committed his troops on the right, meaning I was tying up more points than I had committed there.

Unfortunately, disaster then struck!

If you are pushing forward hard on one side of the battlefield, you need to make sure that you watch out for enemy troops from the flank turning through 90 degrees and then hitting your advancing units in the flank.

My two non-fanatic units of Warriors had got a square forward of the main battle line, showing Darius’ veteran lancers (plus army standard) a little too much of their flank. I had my covering force on the left ready to intervene should the lancers turn, but really needed to pull the left hand Warrior unit back one square to be safe.

Two goes (I had a general present) to get 4+ on the cards and I failed both. There’s only a 9% chance of that happening!

Adrian took full advantage, and smashed his veteran cavalry into the flank of the stuck-in-the-mud Warriors, smashing them from the field. Their General died too, meaning that I gave up five of my sixteen coins in one loss!

Worse, there was the second unit of Warriors also with their flank exposed. Adrian hit that too, doubly disordering it with other enemy troops sending it from the field shortly afterwards. For those keeping count, that’s eight or half my coins gone!

But I wasn’t giving up yet. As planned, I’d smashed Adrian’s left flank (i.e. on my right) and was within Ames Ace of taking his camp there too. I had taken seven of his coins so far, so although I was losing, it was not by a huge margin, especially as Adrian’s right flank, now committed as he could see victory in front of him, hadn’t achieved very much.

Unfortunately, again, Darius and his pooping veteran cavalry weren’t finished yet!

They carried on their rampage across the field and hit one of my Fanatical Warrior units in the flank. They rapidly lost their devotion to the cause and fled the field, taking another General with them along with my lst few coins!

Although a disappointing result, it had been a great game of To The Strongest.

I must confess that the early manoeuvres had left me thinking that, after a grind, I could probably win the game…but Adrian spotting the slightly too advanced warband, me failing to move it backwards, and then Adrian superbly taking full advantage not once, not twice but three times in a row rightfully gave the win to the Persians.

It just goes to show how one event can decide the course of a battle, and it’s perhaps fitting that the unit that won Adrian the game (and then some!) was the one I had destroyed to win the warm-up game, Darius getting his revenge!

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Game 1: Arab Conquest vs Later Lithuanians

/

My first game proper at this year’s To The Smallest 15mm TTS tournament in Cardiff was against John’s Later Lithuanians: light cavalry, more light cavalry…and even more light cavalry!

My main concern was getting outflanked and enveloped by the Lithuanian horde, so I took full advantage of my mounted infantry to deploy as close to the enemy as possible.

I should also note at this point that this was actually our second deployment: a mix up regarding what the terrain actually represented meant that I had severely compromised my set up but, once we both understood what was Impassable and, more importantly, what was not, John was very happy for me to adjust my positioning…a generous example of great sportsmanship on his part.

As expected, the Lithuanians’ first move was to advance quickly against my flanks. I was okay on the right, where my outnumbered troops were helped by the marshy terrain, but things were not looking so good on the left, where the beginnings of an overlap were already beginning to show.

Things went from bad to worse on the left as I desperately, and ultimately unsuccessfully, tried to stem the tide of the Lithuanian horde. The left was lost: I would have to win the battle elsewhere.

John’s army might have been large and manoeuvrable, but it was fragile: if I could connect with a unit, even one of his massed lights, then I could probably kill it. It was the connecting bit that would be difficult, as his horsemen could evade away from infantry charges with comparative ease and my cavalry were tied up on the wings.

That was, however, the only thing I could do, so I set about relentlessly charging every light horse unit I could with my infantry. This shot, taken after a couple of turns of this, shows how fragmented the action had become: rather than two battle line clashing in the centre of the table, the game broke down into a myriad of minor actions scattered across the field.

There were several epic chases as my foot soldiers desperately tried to close with the Lithuanian light horse. A unit of veteran Daylami javelinmen chased down some enemy cavalry until the horsemen crashed into a wood on the edge of the table and were forced to fight…and then die!

A unit of fanatical warriors chased some Lithuanians right to their baseline, even taking one of their camps as they did so.

I even managed to bring one of the cavalry units from the right wing back into the action and use them to squish some Lithuanian light horse up against the back of another of my warrior units. I was doign everything I could to whack-a-mole the enemy!

Finally the Lithuanians had had enough: their last victory medal was taken as the survivors fled the field. That had been a 13-9 victory to the Arabs and one hell of a game!

I was just pleased we had been fighting on a simulation of the field of Thermopylae, with the fighting area of the tabletop narrowed by plentiful terrain on the flanks. I might have won this time, but a more open table would, I think, have led to me being enveloped by the Lithuanians even with me trying to chase them down.

A good start to the day!

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Warm-Up Game

/

This year’s To The Smallest 15mm tournament for To The Strongest was again held at Firestorm Games in Cardiff: an excellent venue for what is proving to be an excellent event, ably organised by Sid.

I would be using my relatively new Arab Conquest army, figures from Red Copper 3D printing sculpts printed for me by Baueda in Italy before they were sold to the UK.

I got to Cardiff in late afternoon on the Friday and checked into my hotel “room” before heading down to Firestorm to see if anyone fancied a warm-up game.

I say “room” because I was staying in the Cardiff Premier Inn Zip hotel: a pod hotel which only cost me £32 for the night. I highly recommend it for those in a similar “just need somewhere to stay” situation: cheap, plenty of parking, very clean, food & drink available until 3am, and a power shower to die for! Yes, the pod is not very big, but it more than fitted me and my ego!

Then it was down to Firestorm Games to see who was already there and, more importantly, who fancied a game. Mark, Howard and Adrian were all present and correct, so Adrian and I settled dwon to play whilst the other two watched and made helpful comments and suggestions!

The big innovation with To The Smallest is that the figures are based on a 10cm frontage and play is on a 12x18 grid that gives plenty of room for manouevre.

Adrian had brought Later Achaemenid Persians with him, and we scattered a bit of random terrain on the table and prepared to set to: my mounted infantry meaning that the two sides started the game a little closer together than the norm.

My plan, such as it was, was just to close with the enemy as soon as possible. I seemed to have a bit of an advantage of numbers on the left, so that’s where I began my advance.

The Persians chose not to mix it with the Jund cavalry and their light camelry support, evading away and shooting their bows instead.

Meanwhile, on the right, it was my turn to be cautious, as the terrain was quite dense and the Persians had managed to move some of their troops over to outnumber me. The two sides clashed but without much of a resolution, although the tactical picture looked better for the enemy.

I had chosen not to advance in the centre for the time being, letting the Persians come to me. This let Darius and his deep lancers punch through my centre, chasing some lights right the way back to my fortified camp only to stop there without attempting to take it.

The game had now broken down into a sprawling series of individual melees with no coordination or battle lines evident. It looked as if it was going to be the cumulative effect of all these isolated fights that would decide the game.

On the right, the two sides kept knocking seven bells out of each other until there was literally no-one left alive in that area of the battlefield!

In the centre, some of my Warriors took on the mercenary Greek Hoplites, slogging it out with both sides disordered to no great conclusion.

On the right, my outnumbered troops had fought a rather decent rearguard action, keeping his superior number occupied whilst I tried to win the battle elsewhere.

So where was the battle decided?

Well, if you remember, Darius and his deep cavalry had punched through the middle of my line and had been molesting my light infantry. This left the Persian horsemen a bit isolated on my side of the table…where I had some veteran Daylami tribesmen just itching to take them on.

A flank charge later, the Persians were disordered, and evaded away with the Daylami in hot pursuit.

The Daylami chased them across the tabletop, over hills, eventually coming to grips with the Persians again as they were forced to fight or run the risk of ending up fighting my javelinmen in woods.

Some decent cards later and the Persians were toast: three medals for the unit and a medal for the army standard being enough to give me the game.

That had been a wild and fragmented encounter that could have gone either way.

In the end I had been comparatively lucky to win enough of the individual fights to give me the win but, as you can see in the photo below, neither side had much of their army left at all!

A great way to start the weekend, and my thanks to Adrian for a good game.

TTS AAR: The Arab Conquest of Siam!

/

A practice game for the forthcoming To The Smallest tournament saw my Arab Conquest army taking on Rob’s Siamese.

With at least half of my troops being mounted infantry, things were going to move fast in this game!

Looking at the picture above, you’ll see that Rob has deployed all his elephants (and they were legion!) in one command on my right flank. Now Nellies, as anyone who plays TTS knows, are anaethema to cavalry, and I had a brigade of cavalry facing them, so the first thing to do was to effect ‘the ol’ switcheroo’ and move that brigade to the other side of the field as soon as possible.

This proved a good move, as my left flank cavalry brigade had failed to smash through the enemy cavalry there, so needed reinforcement: ably provided by the switched cavaly who helped in to punch through the enemy line.

Meanwhile, the two main lines had clashed, and a fierce but initially inconclusive melee broke out:

A slight distraction was caused by my Arab lance-armed camelry, who manged to sneak through the Siamese battle line and take one of the Thai camps.

This forced Rob to drop back some of his men to defend the camps (the initial Aces causing much hilarity!) and the Arabs were soon evicted and sent fleeing. Although only a fleeting success, this did cause Rob to hold back some of his men to deal with the camelry, so taking some of the pressure off my line.

This was a very relevant factor, as the elephants on my right had pushed the fanatical Arab infantry back…but their mahouts were having difficulty then turning the beasts into the centre towards the rest of my troops, and some light infantry to exploit the situation could have really helped the Thai cause, especially this also meant I had the freedom to move another unit of Arab fanatics forward onto the flank of the advancing pachyderms without having to worry about turnign my flank towards the enemy.

Meanwhile, and after a bit of effort, the Jund cavalry on the other side of the table had finally managed to deal with most of the Siamese horse and had now manoeuvered into a position to roll up the enemy line.

Four times the “blue” unit of Jund cavalry you can see in the right hand picture above tried to charge the Siamese flank: and four times they either failed to move at all, or failed to break the raw archers they had already disordered: a disgraceful performance that almost cost the Arabs the victory!

Things were now cricical for both sides as the advantage in the combat in the main battle lines swung backwards and forwards. Despite my initial successes, the game was very much still in the balance.

Finally, however, the Arab infantry on the right hand side of the field managed to break first one then another enemy unit of elephants, undoubtedly helped by the fact that the units were both deep and fanatical.

This, combined with the initial success of the cavalry on the left, and the one-for-one losses in the centre (which should have been a devastating roll up for the blue unit of Jund cavalry!) gave me the coins I needed to break the Siamese morale, and victory was mine!

Well that had been a very close run thing indeed!

What had looked like a battle-winning success on the left petered out into nothing as the Arab lights were ejected from the camp that they had taken and the Jund cavalry failed to roll up the enemy line as expected. The centre proved a hard fight, with veteran infantry on both sides going at it hammer and tongs, and it was only the fact that the deep fanatics on the right were so hard to kill that gave me the win.

Another great game of TTS!

TTS AAR: Ewelme 25 Game 4: Venice Abroad vs Hussites

/

My fourth and final game at the Ewelme tournament this year was against the Hussites: a controversial army featuring a large amount of fortified war wagons.

Why controversial, you ask? Well, in a tournament setting that super-rewards an outright victory, it’s hard to achieve a conclusive result when one party sits at the back of the battlefield and just waits for his opponent to attack.

Personally I don’t agree. It’s a competition, it’s a legitimate army list…learn how to beat it in a timely fashion rather than just complaining!

Anyhoo: on to the game. First up, a bit of psychological warfare. I announced to Neil, commanding the Hussites, that I had enough points to rank in the top four or five so didn’t need to risk losing the game, so my Venetians would also stay at the back of the battlefield and not move!

This seemed to somewhat annoy him (which was, after all, the whole idea) so after stretching things out for a bit (as a good joke deserves a bit of time to mature!) I knuckled down and got to work.

The Hussites had set up in their usual formation: a long line of wagons backed by infantry with impassable terrain at either end.

Now I used to play a lot of 19th Century Colonial wargaming, and the one thing that commanding the Mahdists or the Zulus taught me (apart from not fighting a modern war with medieval weapons!) was that it was the corners of a square that were vulnerable i.e. don’t charge straight at it where the whole of one side can target you, go for the corners where only some of the enemy can shoot you.

My tactics therefore were to concentrate my missile troops on the left front corner of the Hussite line, also getting around their flank and shooting over the impassable terrain, whilst I advanced my dismounted later knights up to attack once the fire from the missile troops had started to have an effect.

Yes, I dismounted my later knights (who dismount with two-handed choppers!) but kept my standard knights on horseback in case I needed a quick reaction force for something.

This worked very nicely indeed, and I had soon killed one war wagon and one unit of supporting infantry for the loss of three quarters of my ammunition, and had my later knights ready to go in.

Unfortunately, the later knights were having one of their off days, and didn’t carve through the oppositio n like they should have done, but things werre progressing nicely, and it was only a matter of time before that end of the Hussite line collapsed.

At this point Neil realised that he had to do something different, so opened up the other end of his line of wagons and let his cavalry (decent lancers and light cavalry) out with the intention of marauding around my right flank.

This was, of course, utterly anticipated, and my knights (still on their horses) moved forward to counter the threat.

The initial clash wasn’t as successful as I had hoped - as I said, for some reason my knights were all having an off day - but with the infantry helping the enemy cavalry were soon on the run.

Particularly pleasing was squishing his light cavalry up against one of his own war wagons now positioned in front of some impassable terrain:

Unfortunately, time had been ticking away, and although I only needed a few more coins to win outright, I only had one last turn to get them.

My later knights didn’t manage it, so the only other chance was my Alabardiers charging into the back of the Hussite veteran cavalry (with general who had no other unit to go to, so would disappear if the cavalry broke): unable to evade because, you guessed it, they were also squished up against the wall of war wagons.

Unfortunately, although the Alabardiers had two goes at breaking the cavalry, and hit several times, the Hussite horse were veterans and managed to save the lot: Neil drawing high cards out of his deck right, left and centre!

So the game ended in 113-53 winning draw for the Venetians: frustrating as I would have had ‘em properly if there had been one more turn to play! Still, a satisfying result that showed the Hussites can be beaten: especially as I achieved this result with all my knights, mounted and dismounted, having a really bad set of cards.

This was the final game of the day, and when the points were totted up, my two wins, one winning draw and one loss saw me into fourth place: not a bad result.

Frustratingly, once the final scores were published, I realised just how close the top spots had been. Had my Alabardiers managed to finish off the Hussite cavalry and their general in the closing moments of the game—securing me an outright victory—I would have taken second place overall! How annoying is that? Probably as annoying as when I turned to Neil and cheerfully declared that the Venetians, too, would be staying right where they were on their side of the table at the start of the game…

 

TTS AAR: Ewelme 25 Game 3: Venice Abroad vs Late Romans

/

My third game at this year’s Ewelme tournament was against Si and his Late Romans, rapidly becoming my nemesis opponents! It’s a small-ish army but packed full of veteran legionaries and auxilia that do very well against my Venetians, and a nasty shock unit of veteran cataphracts.

Both sides began the battle by advancing forward cautiously. On the left flank, I carelessly allowed the Romans to get an overlap, and would spend the rest of the game defending from a tactically outnumbered position there.

This meant that I needed to force the right as soon as possible, so I advanced my infantry and second command of knights forward as fast as possible.

Battle was generally joined on the right but to no clear outcome in the main line, although some of the Roman infantry on the far left did punch through and head for my baseline. No matter, I had some knights who could sort them out!

Much to my surprise, the infantry battle in the centre wasn’t a complete disaster, with the Venetian foot holding their own against the veteran Auxilia. Maybe I could win on the right before Si’s cavalry stuffed me on the left!

First up, I really needed to get rid of that pesky unit of Legionaries down in the left hand corner: a nice four coins just waiting to be collected by the Knights.

But they needed to get their skates on, as things were not going well on the left…

But in the end it was not to be.

I had two chances to win the game (as we were both now down to minimal coins): the Knights I’ve already mentioned and the Later Knights who had punched through at the other end of the field and were now in as position to threaten the enemy camp.

Unfortunately, the Knights just couldn’t get anywhere against the Legionaries, despite still having their lances for the first clash. Frontally charging undisordered veteran infantry is not a an easy clash to win!

And although the Later Knights took one of the enemy camps, Si managed to get some light infantry into the other camp meaning it was just an activation too far to take that one as well and get enough coins to win the game.

In the end, the game ended with a bit of a damp squib: with one of my Spear units falling foul of the javelins thrown by some Roman cavalry, and the game was lost before I could win it next turn.

Not a good result for the Venetians, but a great game of To The Strongest.

On the left, Si’s tactics gave him an immediate advantage but I managed to defend the position for longer than I expected to. On the right, the game could have gone to either side, mainly due to the unexpected efforts of the Venetian infantry, so it was just the way it goes that Si dealt the winning blow first.

Editor’s Note: Subsequent to the battle, Si has pointed out that although outside of competitions we have a fairly evenly matched success rate, I’ve never actually beaten him in a tournament. Thank you, mate, I’ll bear that in mind for next time!

TTS AAR: Ewelme 25 Game 2: Venice Abroad vs Ikko-Ikki

/

My second game at this year’s Ewelme tournament was against Colin’s Ikkio-Ikki: a nasty bunch of Japanese samurai monks who all happened to be (a) fanatic and (b) carry big choppers i.e. hard to kill and lethal in combat!

As expected, as the battle began, the Ikko-Ikki eschewed any tactics and just headed straight for my battle line intending to use their naginatas to deadly effect.

My plan was to weight everything away from the left flank, aiming to defeat half their army with two-thirds of mine on the frest of the table, and then turn back to defeat the second half in due course. The knights would punch through their line on the far left and far right of my line whilst my over-matched infantry just held on until the knights could turn and hit the Ikko-Ikki in the rear.

On the left flank, the Later Knights did their jobs very nicely, but the helmet-heads didn’t: the usual cardboard Venetian armour coming into play.

This effectively left my left flank wide open apart from some nervous looking light infantry, meaning that I really needed to win on the right as soon as possible, or see my super-expensive camps fall to the religeous nutters costing me a lot of coins!

Meanwhile, in the centre, my infantry were hanging on for dear life: only really surviving because I had one extra unit that could help hold the left part of the line…but the Ikko-Ikki were remorseless in attack, and soon the centre began to look very shaky indeed.

It was all down to the knights on the right, helped by the victorious later knights on the left.

They had indeed punched through the enemy line, and were now looking at how best to finish the game before the left and centre finally gave way.

Everything now worked out rather nicely.

The later knights that had been successful on the left swept into the centre and smashed some of the Ikko-Ikki cavalry reserve that had been coming forward to plug the gap, from the field.

This allowed the knights of the right to position themselves perfectly to turn the tide of the battle my way: one unit headed for the flank of the Ikko-Ikki line that was threatening my infantry, the other spotted a chance to make a sudden thrust forward and take the enemy camp, not undefended but currently unoccupied!

Here’s an overview of the positions as we moved into the final phase of the game. You can see that my plan has worked: four of Colin’s units on the left (as you look at the picture) are facing one unit of Venetian light infantry, leaving the rest of my army free to attack the rear and flanks of the rest of his troops.

Note the lone Ikko-Ikki unit at my baseline on the right. They could have caused me some trouble, but Colin was unlucky with the cards, and they never really got a look in to the action after their initial success.

The end of the game the came quickly, as my knights on the right went to work.

The enemy camp was taken, and the flank of the Ikko-Ikki infantry line was charged, with even the intervention of the rest of the enemy cavalry having no effect on the later knights that had come over from the left.

So a 158-83 victory for the Venetians, but it had not been the easy battle the scoreline suggest. Those fanatical, naginata-wielding Ikko-Ikki are very tasty in combat, and had Colin managed to get the whole lot of them in against my troops, things would have been very different indeed!

TTS AAR: Ewelme 25 Game 1: Venice Abroad vs Konmenon Byzantines

/

One of the great things about competitions is that you can never tell who you’re going to be fighting next.

Somewhat ironic, then, that my first game at this year’s Ewelme tournament was an exact repeat of my final game at Roll Call 2025, the last event I’d attended: my Venice Abroad versus Nigel’s Konmenon Byzantines…although both sides had slightly different armies as the set points totals were different between the two competitions.

The terrain was unusually dense, with significant patches of impassable or rough ground on the flanks. This had the effect of channelling the battle into the central zone, although it looked as if the Byzantines were going to try and slip round the outside of the poor going on their right flank.

As the game began, both sides advanced forward strongly on one wing. Nigel sent his troops forward against my right, and I slammed forward on my left, hoping to take advantage of the fact that some of the Byzantines were the opposite side of the impassable terrain so had effectively ruled themselves out of the first part of the battle.

I was unfortunately immediately in a bit of tactical trouble as, on the left, my veteran later knights managed to lose their initial charge and ended up disordered and, on the right, the Varangian Guard ran over the other unit of later knights. The famous Venetian cardboard armour striking again!

On the right, the situation was partly stabilised when the (normal) knights there managed to destroy the Byzantine Skutatoi but, in the meantime, battle had been joined in the centre and my men weren’t doing very well at all!

At this point Nigel made possibly the critical decision of the game. If you look at the picture above, you’ll see that (top, right) the Varangians have turned towards my victorious knights rather than turning towards the flank of my beleagured battle line.

Nigel was (quite rightly) very worried about his Varangians getting some knights charging right up their collective backsides, but if he’d turned towards my line, got a hit that killed the already-disordered right hand infantry unit (and his men did have big choppers!) he could perhaps have cascaded that disorder down the line and effectively ended the game.

But he didn’t, and the game went on…

Back to the left flank, and my knights there (both types) had recovered the situation nicely and driven his troops there from the field, apart from the units that had been on the other side of the poor terrain which were now busy driving my light troops on the left back and off the board.

So that is the situation as we hit the final stage of the game: one more significant hit would give me the win and it was still my initiative, but if I didn’t get that hit and win the game this turn, my main line was going to break, losing me at least three units, and probably give Nigel the win.

My crossbowmen had been sitting on a hill throughout the entire game doing sterling service shooting down Nigel’s light cavalry. As mentioned above, some Byzantine horse had driven my light troops back down the far left hand side, although I had managed to disorder them and wound their general as they did so.

The crossbowmen had one shot left so raised their weapons and opened fire: a hit and, I must confess, I can’t remember if it was the Byzantine horse or general who died, but it was enough to give me the last few coins I needed for the win!

Well that had been the closest of close run things, giving me a win 186-33 points: a scoreline that doesn’t reflect the actual situation at all. As I said, if my main battle line had collapsed, and it was about to do so, Nigel could easily had snatched victory from the jaws of defeat!

A great game of To The Strongest: very exciting until the very last moment.

TTS AAR: Arab Conquest on the Rampage

/

Neil and I had time for another go at the Arab Conquest versus Early Crusader. The picture below is from after my first turn, where I’ve taken full advantage of my mounted infantry to get as far forward as possible on my left flank, whilst refusing my right, leaving it covered by a couple of units of Jund cavalry.

With such a quick rush forward, battle was quickly joined, and before long I was well into the process of turning the Crusader right flank: the light camelry again proving their worth.

Everything was happening very quickly: my Arabs had also generally engaged across the centre:

On the right, however, the Crusader cavalry had come forward and was poised to cause me some problems.

Fortunately, a bit of clever manouevring largely countered the threat.

Meanwhile my troops on the left had largely won the combat there, and were starting to curl into the centre:

This was too much for the Crusaders to take, and they withdrew from the field of battle.

TTS AAR: The Arab Conquest Begins

/

Having finally painted and based enough 15mm Arab Conquest figures to make an army, it was time to get them onto the tabletop for the first time. Neil, my opponent, played an Early Crusader force which, whilst not exactly contemporary, was closer than many recent match-ups!

The Arabs were almost all resin prints of the Red Copper range augmented by a few metal figures from Essex and Blue Moon to fill in the gaps. The Early Crusaders were actually Normans from the excellent Museum Miniatures Z range.

The game opened with the Arabs charging forward as fast as possible in order to take full advantage of their mounted infantry bonus to try and avoid too much archery and crossbow fire from the Crusaders before getting stuck in to melee.

Superior numbers also gave me an overlap on both sides, especially as the Crusaders had deployed stacked quite deep, and I wanted to see if I could get my cavalry on the right and camelry on the left round and into the Crusader flanks: something achieved very successfully.

On the right flank, my cavalry were now in a perfect position to turn and roll up the Crusader line.

This, however, proved more difficult to do than expected due to a combination of clever defensive work from the Crusaders, taking advantage of the patch of rough terrain and their camp to anchor their formation, and some bad luck with the cards.

Eventually, however, that pesky unit of Crusader infantry in the rough ground gave way under sustained pressure from front and flank, and the roll up began.

This was good news indeed…but things were not going so well on the left flank.

Although I’d got the camelry around and into the Crusader rear, they had failed to deliver on their potential, with my Jund cavalry also not performing well against the Norman knights and being forced to retreat in disorder.

This left his cavalry free to do to me what I had been trying to do to Neil i.e. head back into the centre of the field and roll up my line, now generally engaged there.

Both the Arabs and Crusaders had now managed to roll up one of their opponent’s flanks, making the situation critical for both sides: one more unit lost would mean defeat.

Unfortunately for the Arabs, Neil had the advantage in both troops and positioning, meaning that unless I could pull something out of the hat, I would end up snatching defeat from the jaws of victory: I just had too many units on the verge of breaking to survive another Crusader turn, with the double-disordered warband about to be charged by a fresh unit of veteran Norman knights being the prime candidate to go first!

All I had left to try was to send my disordered Jund cavalry on the left, accompanied by an already-wounded general, into a desperate charge against an equally disordered unit of Crusader cavalry accompanied by their True Cross army standard.

This was a tad risky, as the Knights had a better save than I did, but I would attack first and, quite frankly, this was my only hope of victory! A ‘10’ was pulled for my activation card, so I was only going to get one go at this, and I reached for my attack card: a ‘9’, which was a hit despite my disorder.

Neil’s save card was pulled and, much to my surprise, the disordered Jund cavalry swept the Normans from field: a glorious victory that, as the True Cross fell, led to the rest of the Crusdaer army retreating just as it looked as though they would win the game!

A glorious victory for the Arabs: snatching victory from the jaws of defeat rather than the other way around!

More Teeny-Tiny TTS

/

Neil had time for another game of To The Stongest using his 2mm figures. I’d play the Romans again, Neil would take the Ancient Brits.

Following my previous defeat, I thought I’d try something a bit different this time, and stacked most of my troops on the right intending to overwhelm him there before turning back to destroy the rest of his army.

As the game began, my plan unfolded successfully, and at least a third of his troops ended up effectively out of the game until they could get across the table and back into the action.

Unfortunately things began going wrong shortly after that!

Part of the plan was for my veteran heavy cavalry to punch their way through the British chariots facing them on the far right. This didn’t happen and, in fact, the chariots won the encounter and thus blocked my flanking manoeuvre from happening.

Worse, the veteran Legionaries, advancing forward quickly to engage the warbands facing them, failed to dent the Celts, even with a numerical advantage. There really was something wrong with my troops today!

This, of course, gave Neil the time to bring his “missing” men back across the table and into combat, leading to a most unpleasant situation featuring the Legions being potentially attacked from front and flank…

Although the Roman cavalry had by now managed to dispose of the chariots, the time it had taken them to do so left them trapped in the top right hand corner of the battlefield as the Celtic warbands and Legionary units went at it to their left.

The Legionaries were still fighting very badly indeed, and had been pushed back into a position where the British could start to apply their by-now-superior numbers.

In the end, the British did to the Romans what the Romans had been trying to do to them: the Celtic cavalry arrived from the far reaches of the other side of the table and curled round to threaten to take the Romans in the flank.

So two defeats in a row for the teeny-tiny Romans. Admittedly I’d tried the bold tactic of severely weighting one flank, but that had worked until my troops failed to take advantage of their tactical position just after the beginning of the battle.

Captain Hindsight has pointed out that perhaps I was expecting too much from the Legionaries to quickly defeat the warbands in front of them (I should have anticipated the need for a slow, grinding victory) but the Roman infantry didn’t really achieve anything all game: not one warband was destroyed!

The real culprits, of course, were the veteran Roman cavalry. A pathetic initial performance that they admittedly recovered from, but too late to be useful.

So the manoeuvre phase was a success, but the execution of the combat phase didn’t: something to build on for next time!

Teeny-Tiny To The Strongest

/

Friend Neil invited me over for a game of To The Strongest using his 2mm figures. This was a new experience for me as I’d never played with anything so small before (quiet in the cheap seats!).

I would play the Early Imperial Romans, with Neil taking the Ancient Britons.

My plan was to hold the centre with my legionaries and auxiliaries whilst my cavalry (doubtless superior to the chariots in front of them) on the right flank smashed through what was in front of them and curled around to take the warbands in the centre in the rear.

Unfotunately, my cavalry were having an off day, and made no progess at all against the “Ancient British Panzer Division” in front of them.

This meant that I had to send the legions in against the British centre, but even that didn’t go very well as the command on the right got decisively mullered!

This was all very disappointing, and made worse when some Celtic cavalry that, up to now, I had kept bottled up on the left managed to get clear and take the same battered command in the flank.

So a fairly decisive win for the Brits as I wrestled with adjusting to the different scale.

TTS AAR: Roll Call #4: Venice Abroad vs Komnenon Byzantines

/

My fourth and last game at this year’s Roll Call was against Nigel’s Byzantines: a powerful army who had carved up my Romans at the rceent World Championships!

My stratagem was Flank March so I decided to leave my right flank very light and send my best unit of veteran Later Knights (with army standard) off that way to see if I could temp Nigel’s cavalry forward to then be neatly taken in the flank or rear by my Knights.

This worked very nicely (although I messed up how it should have been played, so thanks to Tim, as referee, for ruling so adroitly and to Nigel for waving off my error) with one unit of enemy cavalry being smashed right off the table immediately after the Knights’ arrival.

On the other flank, both sides had advanced rapidly towards each other and an enormous, sprawling melee broke out. Fortunately for the Venetians, Nigel’s Varangian Guard and Skoutatoi were not having a particularly good day (they were the lads who had eviscerated my Romans!) and were contained by my troops, helped by the terrain. The Venetians also manged to knock quite a few Byzantine light units off the table: perhaps not tactically significant but still a trickle of Byzantine coins lost.

Meanwhile, back to the other flank, and my Knights had polished off all the Byzantine cavalry they could find to kill. They were having a good day: also killing the enemy general and taking the Byzantine Holy Icon standard.

I was now significantly ahead on coins, but under huge pressure back on the left. It was, in fact, fair to say that my troops there were about to collapse!

My camps were also under attack, but the militia Spearmen (led by the chef-and-chicken) were doing their best to defend them.

I needed to finish the game quickly, especially as we were also just about out of time, and suddenly saw an opportunity to do so.

I had a unit of Spearmen plus attached General on a hill about two thirds of the way up the board. They had been killing Byzantine lights and were now in a position to turn and attack the rear of the Skoutatoi who were meleeing with more of my Knights.

This I was about to do when I noticed that actually there was a clear path to the enemy camp in front of them. Okay, it was a few squares away, but I had a general with me, and taking the camp would give me the coins I needed to win.

For once the cards were with me, and the Spearmen marched straight into the camp to take Nigel’s last three coins and victory!

This was another game where the result (14-3 to me) didn’t actually reflect the situation. Although I had won the right, taking nine of Nigel’s coins from eliminating three cavalry units, their general and a standard, and only lost a smattering of units myself, I had about four units disordered and ready to break in Nigel’s next turn. I think I would still have won (time allowing) but it would have been a much closer result.

The overall scores were totted up and, much to my surprise, I found that I had come second! I was expecting somewhere 4th or 5th, so it must have been a weird combination of results elsewhere to let me snatch the runner up position: that’s the joy of the Swiss Chess system!

Thanks to Tim for organising the tournament, and to all my opponents for giving me such great games. Congrats to Peter for winning: those of you who have read the AAR of our game will know that I almost had him (score notwithstanding!), which would, presumably, mean that I would hve won overall. Something to work towards next time!

TTS AAR: Roll Call #3: Venice Abroad vs Tibetans

/

My third game at this year’s Roll Call was against Peter and his Tibetans. Peter has sliced and diced me before with this lot, so I was determined to do better this time round.

I had a fair idea of what tactics he was going to employ: one command of light cavalry would dart forward from the outset and attempt to get around one of my flanks. If that worked, then the cataphracts would follow. Failing that, he would use the superior mobility of his all-cavalry army to weight one side of the table, forcing me to fight his whole army with only part of mine.

That was all well and good - I knew what he would try to do - but the real question was whether I could do anything about it!

Things started well when, much to my surprise, I won the scouting. This meant that I could try to counter his intended plans through my deployment.

Note that I have lights on the left to counter his lights, my knights are all in front of his army, and most of my infantry is in the right place as well. Okay, I would have to shift my left flank infantry over to the right as soon as possible, but this was a better position from which to start the battle than I could have anticipated!

The action began on the right, where the heavy cavalry forces on either side advanced cautiously towards each other. I knew I needed to get “first charge” advantage here, so it was a question of tempting Peter into advancing forward and then not quite reaching my troops so I could then charge forward myself.

I didn’t quite manage to do this, but Peter’s first charge on the far right proved unfortunate for him as a unit of Cataphracts disordered themselves charging a unit of my Later Knights whilst my militia Spearmen on hill survived everything the Tibetans could throw at them.

You’ll also see, in the picture above, how Peter has managed to concentrate his forces on my right flank despite me knowing that that was what he was going to do and making every effort to stop him doing so! If you count them up, you’ll see I have two units of Knights, one militia Spear and a Light Cavalry versus four units of Cataphracts, some veteran, and five units of horse archers.

And this is also actually where I lost the battle. On my next turn the Later Knights on the far right charged their disordered opponents and not only failed to sweep them from the board (potentially also taking out some of the light cavalry following through morale checks) but were actually dashed from the tabletop themselves! Extraordinary: but there’s not much you can do against luck like that!

This effectively let Peter through on that flank…but more of that in a moment.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the table, I had not only countered his annoying light cavalry but was actually driving the Tibetans backwards: the cunning use of Cry Havoc! caltrops giving me an initial advantage that I was quick to exploit.

Unfortunately I just couldn’t pin the mobile mounted Tibetans down for long enough to actually kill them, so although we were about even on medals won, I just couldn’t finish off the units I was fighting.

We had now been playing for almost the whole of the allocated 90 minutes, the scores were about even, and we went into Peter’s last turn.

Firstly, he took full advantage of his success on the right and cleared my troops from that side of the table, including the equally-cunning use of his stratagem Someone has Blundered! to take control of my last remaining unit of Knights there and make them retreat backwards off the table. That was four medals gone immediately, and you can see that the militia Spearmen, already disordered and hit in the flank, are next!

You can, by the way, also see just on the other side of the hill, a unit of my Knights hitting some of his horse. This was originally a flank charge by my Knights into his cavalry that should, by rights, have at least disordered the Tibetans but, no, they survived and by this time had turned to face me. That would have been four coins my way as their general would have gone as well.

At this point we were on for a draw: probably a winning draw in Peter’s favour but still a draw.

Unfortunately all this excitement had caused me to leave the tiniest gap in my defences which, with the last cards of the game, Peter managed to exploit and get into one of my camps.

This took the last of my victory medals and cost me a full loss rather than a losing draw. If only I’d found the time to move those light crossbowmen to the right at some earleir stage!

So I came close, but still ended up being trounced 14-3, with eleven coins lost in the final moments of the game.

I took some consolation, however, in the fact that the result didn’t really reflect the game, and in the thought that I’d pretty much countered Peter’s standard strategies through my deployment and tactics and had been on an even keel with him right up to when my Knights failed to take advantage of a great position on my right. I’ll ‘ave him next time!

TTS AAR: Roll Call #2: Venice Abroad vs Vikings

/

My second game at this year’s Roll Call tournament was against Andy and his Vikings: an infantry army full of large, hairy types armed with big choppers!

Somewhat unsurprisingly, I won the scouting and, having seen where the Vikings had positioned themselves decided to try and turn his left flank with my Knights whilst the rest of my army kept as far away from the enemy as possible, largely deploying on the edge of my side of the table.

This was all very well, but Andy then played the This Way Effendi stratagem on me, which meant that the infantry command that were supposed to be occupying my camp had been led astray by a guide who was in the pay of the enemy and would start the game one box to the rear which, as they were on the edge of the table, meant off-table…which meant that my lovely three fortified camps would start the game empty of any Venetians!

Obviously this wouldn’t be a problem, as all I needed to bring them on in the first turn was to draw a 4+ (camps are difficult terrain):

A good start to the game but, no matter, on with the plan as I sent my knights forwards as fast and as far as possible.

The cards were with me, and the Viking left flank was soon under huge pressure as a mass of heavily armoured horsemen his them in the front and flank and rapidly started to roll them up.

The rest of the Vikings, however. had rushed forward as fast as they could, intending to win the game by just running over the rest of my troops.

Although by now I had managed to get the force that was supposed to be guarding the camp back on the table, this didn’t stop one unit of Scandies punching through my line like a seax through butter and taking one of my camps. Ouch!

It was now a race to see who could exploit their situation fastest: could I polish off Andy’s left flank, taking his army standard and hopefully the game, before he could turn the hairies in my camp and take the other two sections to get the coins he needed to win.

My knights were. for once, on good form, and were able to totally clear the Vikings in front of them from the table.

Unfortunately, this still left me a two coins short of ultimate victory. The tension was now so great that one of my units suffered a casualty and had to be replaced from my reserves!

Things were also critical on my left flank. Although the Vikings in my camp had failed to make the turn that would have let them take the other two sections (presumably looting the fabulous luxuries that acompany my troops on their campaigns), my Alabardiers were being attacked by three Viking warbands, and surely couldn’t hold out for long.

Fortunately, I had chosen them to receive the Tonight we dine in hell! stratagem, so they were able to shrug off their first disorder, add a hero, and hold their own for that turn. They are top left in the picture below.

The Vikings then surrounded the Alabardiers, and things looked even more critical: I could see myself losing them, the other two camps, and the two Spearman units shown in the picture above in the Vikings’ next turn…and the victorious knights were still a square or two short of being able to return to the action and take the Vikings in the rear.

That would give the Vikings victory despite the fact that they themselves only now had two coins left and I had loads. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory!

Salvation, however, came from an unlikely source.

I had been covering my far left flank with a couple of units of Atmati di schioppe or handgunner light infantry, and one of these now crashed into the rear of the veteran Huscarls flanking the Alabardiers.

Incredibly, the handgunners managed to inflict two disorders on the veteran Huscarls, but that was still not enough to break them and win the game. I’d have to get a 7+ to go in again, and then hope that my two 8+ attacks would succeed against the ‘saving on a 6+’ Huscarls: not very good odds (just over 6% I think).

But wait…that’s a general with the Huscarls, and we haven’t checked to see if he is hit yet.

Andy pulled his chits…it was a hit and the general died: taken in the rear by a Venetian hand gunner!

Those two coins were Andy’s last, and the game was mine by 14 coins to 7…but it had been a close run thing and the tables would have been turned on Andy’s next turn if that general had survived.

What a great game!

TTS AAR: Roll Call #1: Venice Abroad vs Burgundian Ordnance

/

Off to Cranfield for the Medieval Mayhem competition at Roll Call. I would field a Venice Abroad force: a mixture of Knights and Spearmen with a good sprinkling of light troops as well.

My first game was against Dillon’s Brugundian Ordnance force: an army very similar to mine, the main difference being that Dillon’s infantry were spear and longbow combined whereas I had separate spear and light infantry missile troops.

The Burgundians pulled the Flank March stratagem, so would start the game with one unit off table. I was initially minded to hold back and see where this arrived, but then decided that boldness was the way forward with the huge open space on the right flank just too tempting: the plan being to overwhelm his cavalry there with my Knights leaving the rest of his force vulnerable to a roll-up from that flank.

Unfortunately the two patches of rough ground and the wood that you can see in the picture above created a bit of a bottleneck that would come back to haunt me later in the game.

This concentration of horse on my right did mean that my left flank was very light: two units of light handgunners, in fact, that seemed to be facing an awful lot of Burgundians panzers, especially as that is where Dillon’s flanking troops eventually turned up.

Back to the right, where my Knights and Light Horse were slowly battering their way through the opposition: the bottleneck initially preventing me from applying my superior number efficiently. Yes, I eventually “won” that flank, but it took far too long to do so!

Meanwhile, on the left, Dillon was trying to clear my inferior force away so that he could do to me there what I was intending to do to him on the right. Unfortunately, a combination of the cards and my Alabardiers refusing to go backwards made things very difficult for him, meaning that his Knights there spent a lot of time dominating an extremely useless empty space!

All this shilly-shallying around, however, meant that we were out of time. This was extremely frustrating as if we’d played one more turn I think I would have had victory: I only needed a couple more of Dillon’s victory medals to win outright, and I had three places where I had fresh troops able to attack disordered Burgundians.

I begged Tim, the refereee, to let us play one more turn…offered bribes of the finest entertainments that Venice has to offer…but all to no avail: the game ended in a draw with the resultant points slightly in my favour as I had killed a slightly greater proportion of Dillon’s troops than he had mine.

A great game, but I rued getting jammed between the rough ground and the woods on the right: open terrain would have meant that I could have applied superior numbers earlier. But it was not to be: all that was left was the faint cry of “please, just let me play one more card”!

TTS AAR: Hittites versus Neo-Assyrians

/

Great to get a game of To The Strongest in with friend Bevan. We went biblical, with Bevan using the Neo-Assyrians versus my Hittites.

Neither side wasted any time, both thundering towards the other…apart from one Assyrian infantry command on the flank that really didn’t want to be involved.

Note the Assyrian infantry peaking into the frame from the left hand side

Whilst the Syrian light chariots kept some of the finally-advancing Assyrian infantry on the left occupied, the left hand command of Hittite heavy chariots smashed into the rest of the left-hand Assyrian infantry and the Assyrian heavy chariots in the centre of the enemy line.

Amazingly (good cards!) the Hittite chariots smashed through both one unit of enemy infantry and one set of Assyrian chariots, punching a huge hole in the centre of the Assyrian line.

Breakthrough at the schwerepunkt!

The other unit of Assyrian Heavy Chariots would also soon be sent flying off table, along with the Assyrian commander-in-chief.

Meanwhile, on the other flank, the other Hittite heavy chariot command had slammed into the Assyrian heavy cavalry, and a fierce melee broke out.

New tech versus old tech on the right

Keeping that flank locked safe was vital to the Hittite cause, as their infantry and more chariots in the centre had fallen victim to a deluge of Assyrian bowfire, and were wavering as the Assyrians closed for combat!

Hittites suffering a nasty attack of the missile fire!

Fortunately the chariots rallied and the Hittite Royal Guard were able to intervene to protect the wavering infantry. Note the Gasgan tribesmen on the left also seeking to get into the action.

Royal Guard to the rescue

Meanwhile, back to the left flank, where the Syrians were still keeping the Assyrian javelinmen occupied.

Back t he right again, where even the Royal Guard had been forced backwards onto a hill. If the Assyrians got their act together and advanced their heavy infantry, the Hittie centre could collapse…especially as the rest of the Hittite chariots were losing the melee on the far right.

Things getting a bit critical on the right!

All the above, however, was just a distraction from the main event: the victorious Hittite chariots left/centre continuing their punch forward to take the Assyrian camp, already packed with the survivors/fleeing infantry/broken chariots of the initial clashes.

Although the first lot of chariots were resoundingly unsuccessful in their attempt to get into the camp, the Hittite chariot commander, briefly delayed by the need to wipe out the other Assyrian heavy chariots, soon arrived to seal the win for the Hittites: taking both their camp and their last few coins.

It had been a very exciting game.

The Hittites had had fantastic early success against the Assyrian heavy chariots, punching right through them, but the Assyrians had responded quickly, taking advantage of their extra strength on the right to put so much pressure on the Hittite line that it almsot buckled. If it hadn’t been for the Hittite Royal Guard intervening at the critical moment, the entire Hittite line could have routed.

Kudos also to the Syrian light chariots on the left. Their skirmishing prevented the Assyrian javelnmen from either rushing back to defend their camp or from intervening in the centre.

This allowed the Hittite chariots in the centre/left, the ones who had broken through, to take the Assyrian camp and thus rip the heart out of the remaining near-victorious army, forcing their retreat and giving the Hittites a win.